Court of Appeal Considers Interpretation of Legal Services
This week the Court of Appeal heard an appeal by the Legal Services Commissioner in the case of Legal Services Commissioner v Fawcett. The New Zealand Bar Association | Ngā Ahorangi Motuhake o te Ture was an intervenor before the High Court and appeared again before the Court of Appeal.
The case concerns the question of whether time spent corresponding with the Legal Services Commissioner is capable of being a legal service funded under the scope of the Act. The High Court found that it was, as the correspondence in this case had “involved work that was significant, complex, and time-consuming.” The Court said that the definition of legal services included taking steps that were preliminary or incidental to a proceeding.
Felix Geiringer presented the submissions for the Bar Association. This is a significant issue for members who work in this area. A New Zealand Law Society survey found that approximately half of the work undertaken on Legal Aid files is not renumerated.
The case was reported in the Post. Read the article
Related News
Sentencing Advocacy Competition 2025
08 OctoberThe 2025 Sentencing Advocacy Competition reached its conclus…
Read more2025 Access to Justice Award Winner
17 SeptemberSonja Cooper has been awarded the 2025 Access to Justice Awa…
Read moreLegal Aid Review: NZBA Urges Reform to Protect Access to Justice
01 SeptemberWe recently submitted feedback on the Ministry of Justice’s …
Read moreInside the Brief: What do solicitors want?
27 AugustThe solicitor–barrister relationship is central to the effec…
Read more